I am reading a wonderful book right now about apprenticeship models of learning and teaching. In this book Alcoholics Anonymous is lifted up as an apprenticeship process. In order for an individual to participate in the A.A. process he/she needs to identify as an alcoholic. If you are a non-alcoholic you cannot be a participant in the A.A. process. (Of course to identify as an alcoholic is precisely the most difficult step – but required for ongoing participation in A.A. none the least. Many folks try out A.A. two or three times before being able to stick with the process. The question of “being ready” is a part of the process of becoming a member of the A.A. community.) The second distinction after self-identifying as an alcoholic, is whether one is a drinking alcoholic or a non-drinking alcoholic. A drinking alcoholic is not the right choice. The community of A.A. exists to help support one’s ongoing, yearly, daily, or hourly movement towards being or becoming a non-drinking alcoholic.
Individuals make similar distinctions about their faith.
The first: I am Christian. I am not Christian.
Variation of the first: I am Christian. You are not Christian.
The second: I am a practicing Christian. I am a non-practicing Christian.
Variation of the second: I am a practicing Christian. You are a C & E Christian, a non-practicing Christian.
It dawned on me this morning that Mainline Protestants, in general, are completely uncomfortable making these distinctions. Sure, we may make fun of C & E Christians behind closed doors but we would never question their identity as a Christian. Nor should we. And as for practicing our Christianity? That’s up to the individual to decide whether they self-identify as practicing or not. Who am I to judge?
However, by not encouraging these distinctions we do not help our cause as a community. Communities, by nature, need boundaries. Christians who make distinctions are stating clearly who they are and what they represent as a community of faith. Like A.A., their community of faith has limits and boundaries: you are a member or not.
Mainline Protestants do make distinctions, however. We make the safer, less judging distinction – between denominations and among ourselves. I am Lutheran and this is why. You are not Lutheran and this is why. I practice Lutheranism the right way. You practice Lutheranism the wrong way. As long as our distinctions remain within the realm of human brokenness and not in God’s work we can be as harsh and cruel as we want to be. When it comes to internecine conflict about worship we are at our worst.
Which distinction is worse? Christian? Non-Christian? Practicing? Non-Practicing? Lutheran? Non-Lutheran? Who am I to judge?
Recent Comments